Barney Rudolph

Barney Rudolph was a solitary man. This is what he silently said in his private story of self. Alienated, a loner, lone wolf, outsider. Always an outsider.
 
First there was the fact that he was adopted. Mr and Mrs Rudolph were a simple, loving couple who had never fathomed the dark and tangled labyrinth of their adopted son’s mind. Misunderstood was his permanent condition.
 
Then, when he moved to New York City as a young man, he was immediately aware that his speech, his clothes, his way of inhabiting his own body, were all... “different.” His view of the world was not shared by the people he met. He made friends and seemed to be well-liked, but he often sat among them at dinner tables mutely nodding, bewildered by all the loud, passionate crosstalk.
 
Barney was a filmmaker. In the corporate arena where he made his living, he was called a “video producer.” But outside the realm of dollars, he was an artist. He worked alone. At one time, he had hoped to direct feature films, but his day job soon taught him that he did not have the skill for collaboration that was required in the motion picture industry. He had survived to middle age as a director of small production crews making low-budget training videos, but his pleasure was always in the after-hours projects, the quirky, personal, dream-like little narratives he conjured up entirely on his own.
 
Barney wanted to make a movie called This is Not a Movie. The author David Markson, whose late works were labeled “postmodern” by critics who like that word, had written a novel entitled This is Not a Novel. Its narrator, called Writer, says, “A novel with no intimation of story whatsoever, Writer would like to contrive." By piling tidbits and factoids upon allusions and fragments, it gradually accumulated a mysterious power. Barney wondered, could this be done on film? He decided to try.
 
But now he was stumped. He read again the novel’s epigraph, a quote from Jonathan Swift:
 

I am now trying an Experiment very
frequent among Modern Authors;
which is, to write upon Nothing.

 
So: a film about nothing. How to start? How to start?
 
Never mind. He went for a walk, and his feet took him to his habitual destination: Broadway at East 12th Street.
 
Barney had read everything Markson had written since Wittgenstein’s Mistress in the late 80s. Acclaimed but un-famous, Markson had died in 2010 and left his entire personal library, sixty-three boxes of books on all subjects, to the Strand, king of independent bookstores. Most of the volumes were heavily annotated with Markson’s curmudgeonly margin scribbles, his cryptic underlines and checkmarks, a breadcrumb trail through a convoluted mind -- a sharp, wry, unorthodox mind. Now they were scattered everywhere amongst the eighteen miles of shelves on three floors, hidden treasures. The Strand was founded in 1927, the year of Markson’s birth, and was just blocks from his Greenwich Village home, where he had died alone at an unknown time and day, in the fecund air of late spring, New York City. Now, some years had passed and it was June again. For months, Barney had been going almost daily to the Strand, spending hours in the narrow, dusty stacks, hoping for a chance encounter with a book once owned, held, studied, marked up by Markson.
 
He found himself in one of the fiction aisles, suddenly hyper-aware of an attractive young woman in black standing and reading a paperback. He watched her in his peripheral vision, debating about asking her what she was reading. Then she stretched out a tattooed arm, placed the book back on the shelf, and walked away. For a moment Barney expected to feel an obligatory disappointment. But his eyes had followed the book, and he realized that it was what he wanted, not her.
 
The book was Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings by Jorge Luis Borges. His heart quickened as he leafed through the pages. Here and there were faint gray underlines and marginalia in a graceful but nearly illegible script. Inside the front cover, a slender pencil line trailed like a hair from under the Strand’s price sticker. Barney peeled back the sticker, and there it was: Markson’s signature.
 
Back in his apartment, Barney poured himself a glass of wine and settled in to read. He’d heard of Borges but was not familiar with his work. Often the scribbled margin notes made no sense to him. He read until the warm spring light faded from his windows. He came across a very short story, “The House of Asterion,” whose fictional first-person narrator was evidently the Minotaur of Greek myth, a solitary creature about to die. Two checkmarks were in the margin next to these two underlined sentences: “The fact is that I am unique. I am not interested in what one man may transmit to other men; like the philosopher, I think that nothing is communicable by the art of writing.” Then he noticed a footnote, surely part of Borges’ literary gamesmanship. The word “infinity” was marked, and it's footnote said, “The original says fourteen, but there is ample reason to infer that, used by Asterion, this numeral stands for infinite.”
 
Below the footnote was Markson’s pencil scrawl: “14 is to Infinity as this [a drawn arrow pointed to the period at the end of the previous sentence] is to Black.”
 
Black. That was it. The place to start.
 
Barney set up his video camera on a tripod. Ten feet in front of the lens, as far away as his cramped apartment would allow, he set up two light stands with a rod between them, from which he suspended a roll of heavy black paper, stretching it down to the floor.
He pulled up a chair, sat, and put his eye to the viewfinder. All he saw was darkness, an electronically mediated black. Thousands of pixels emitting almost zero light, vibrating subtly with absolute nothingness. Perfect.
 
At first he had ideas… he would sit in front of the lens against the black limbo and say whatever came to mind. Short and pithy. Or just short. The pith should be cumulative.
 
Or he would do close-up hand signs, meaningless gestures that would accrue meaning in the viewer’s mind. Perhaps turn his back to the camera, or show a disembodied foot. He could hold up random objects from his apartment. Always against the field of blackness, the vast night.
 
He sat with his left eye closed and his right eye to the viewfinder, staring at the humming dark. He kept on gazing, and before long all the clever ideas faded from his mind. Nothing… here it was. His entire field of view was a rectangular emptiness, a growing, assertive emptiness, slowly advancing upon him through the eyepiece. This was it: Not a Movie. No need to push the record button, no need to do anything. The pure darkness swarmed without malice into his eye, filling him up with nothing.
 
Time passed. Barney did not move… unless perhaps a gradual wavering thinness might be considered motion. Does a mirage move, or is it all illusion?
 
If you were one of Barney’s friends, you surely would like to know more. But this is the end of the story. The art of writing cannot communicate the experience that had once been a man, a man called Barney Rudolph, but was now just something happening in a tiny cube stacked on other cubes in the vast sprawling grid of New York City... something nameless and invisible that went on happening, and went on, and went on.
 
 
© Brent Robison 2018

Barney Rudolph was a solitary man. This is what he silently said in his private story of self. Alienated, a loner, lone wolf, outsider. Always an outsider.
 
First there was the fact that he was adopted. Mr and Mrs Rudolph were a simple, loving couple who had never fathomed the dark and tangled labyrinth of their adopted son’s mind. Misunderstood was his permanent condition.
 
Then, when he moved to New York City as a young man, he was immediately aware that his speech, his clothes, his way of inhabiting his own body, were all... “different.” His view of the world was not shared by the people he met. He made friends and seemed to be well-liked, but he often sat among them at dinner tables mutely nodding, bewildered by all the loud, passionate crosstalk.
 
Barney was a filmmaker. In the corporate arena where he made his living, he was called a “video producer.” But outside the realm of dollars, he was an artist. He worked alone. At one time, he had hoped to direct feature films, but his day job soon taught him that he did not have the skill for collaboration that was required in the motion picture industry. He had survived to middle age as a director of small production crews making low-budget training videos, but his pleasure was always in the after-hours projects, the quirky, personal, dream-like little narratives he conjured up entirely on his own.
 
Barney wanted to make a movie called This is Not a Movie. The author David Markson, whose late works were labeled “postmodern” by critics who like that word, had written a novel entitled This is Not a Novel. Its narrator, called Writer, says, “A novel with no intimation of story whatsoever, Writer would like to contrive." By piling tidbits and factoids upon allusions and fragments, it gradually accumulated a mysterious power. Barney wondered, could this be done on film? He decided to try.
 
But now he was stumped. He read again the novel’s epigraph, a quote from Jonathan Swift:
 

I am now trying an Experiment very
frequent among Modern Authors;
which is, to write upon Nothing.

 
So: a film about nothing. How to start? How to start?
 
Never mind. He went for a walk, and his feet took him to his habitual destination: Broadway at East 12th Street.
 
Barney had read everything Markson had written since Wittgenstein’s Mistress in the late 80s. Acclaimed but un-famous, Markson had died in 2010 and left his entire personal library, sixty-three boxes of books on all subjects, to the Strand, king of independent bookstores. Most of the volumes were heavily annotated with Markson’s curmudgeonly margin scribbles, his cryptic underlines and checkmarks, a breadcrumb trail through a convoluted mind -- a sharp, wry, unorthodox mind. Now they were scattered everywhere amongst the eighteen miles of shelves on three floors, hidden treasures. The Strand was founded in 1927, the year of Markson’s birth, and was just blocks from his Greenwich Village home, where he had died alone at an unknown time and day, in the fecund air of late spring, New York City. Now, some years had passed and it was June again. For months, Barney had been going almost daily to the Strand, spending hours in the narrow, dusty stacks, hoping for a chance encounter with a book once owned, held, studied, marked up by Markson.
 
He found himself in one of the fiction aisles, suddenly hyper-aware of an attractive young woman in black standing and reading a paperback. He watched her in his peripheral vision, debating about asking her what she was reading. Then she stretched out a tattooed arm, placed the book back on the shelf, and walked away. For a moment Barney expected to feel an obligatory disappointment. But his eyes had followed the book, and he realized that it was what he wanted, not her.
 
The book was Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings by Jorge Luis Borges. His heart quickened as he leafed through the pages. Here and there were faint gray underlines and marginalia in a graceful but nearly illegible script. Inside the front cover, a slender pencil line trailed like a hair from under the Strand’s price sticker. Barney peeled back the sticker, and there it was: Markson’s signature.
 
Back in his apartment, Barney poured himself a glass of wine and settled in to read. He’d heard of Borges but was not familiar with his work. Often the scribbled margin notes made no sense to him. He read until the warm spring light faded from his windows. He came across a very short story, “The House of Asterion,” whose fictional first-person narrator was evidently the Minotaur of Greek myth, a solitary creature about to die. Two checkmarks were in the margin next to these two underlined sentences: “The fact is that I am unique. I am not interested in what one man may transmit to other men; like the philosopher, I think that nothing is communicable by the art of writing.” Then he noticed a footnote, surely part of Borges’ literary gamesmanship. The word “infinity” was marked, and it's footnote said, “The original says fourteen, but there is ample reason to infer that, used by Asterion, this numeral stands for infinite.”
 
Below the footnote was Markson’s pencil scrawl: “14 is to Infinity as this [a drawn arrow pointed to the period at the end of the previous sentence] is to Black.”
 
Black. That was it. The place to start.
 
Barney set up his video camera on a tripod. Ten feet in front of the lens, as far away as his cramped apartment would allow, he set up two light stands with a rod between them, from which he suspended a roll of heavy black paper, stretching it down to the floor.
 
He pulled up a chair, sat, and put his eye to the viewfinder. All he saw was darkness, an electronically mediated black. Thousands of pixels emitting almost zero light, vibrating subtly with absolute nothingness. Perfect.
 
At first he had ideas… he would sit in front of the lens against the black limbo and say whatever came to mind. Short and pithy. Or just short. The pith should be cumulative.
 
Or he would do close-up hand signs, meaningless gestures that would accrue meaning in the viewer’s mind. Perhaps turn his back to the camera, or show a disembodied foot. He could hold up random objects from his apartment. Always against the field of blackness, the vast night.
 
He sat with his left eye closed and his right eye to the viewfinder, staring at the humming dark. He kept on gazing, and before long all the clever ideas faded from his mind. Nothing… here it was. His entire field of view was a rectangular emptiness, a growing, assertive emptiness, slowly advancing upon him through the eyepiece. This was it: Not a Movie. No need to push the record button, no need to do anything. The pure darkness swarmed without malice into his eye, filling him up with nothing.
 
Time passed. Barney did not move… unless perhaps a gradual wavering thinness might be considered motion. Does a mirage move, or is it all illusion?
 
If you were one of Barney’s friends, you surely would like to know more. But this is the end of the story. The art of writing cannot communicate the experience that had once been a man, a man called Barney Rudolph, but was now just something happening in a tiny cube stacked on other cubes in the vast sprawling grid of New York City... something nameless and invisible that went on happening, and went on, and went on.
 
 

© Brent Robison 2018

Narrated by Tom Newton.

Narrated by Tom Newton.

POST RECITAL

Talk Icon

TALK

TN: The movie Barney is making at the end of the story -- was that a movie that you wanted to make? Or maybe even made?
 
BR: Well, I was a film major in college and worked many years on the periphery of the industry, so yeah, there have been a lot of films I’ve wanted to make, and a couple I’ve made. But Barney’s wasn’t one of them. That one was born in my writer’s mind, not my filmmaker’s mind. Why do you ask?
 
TN: Well you know.... Barney Rudolph... B.R.... it  makes you wonder.
 
BR: Oh, right. He shares my initials. Hmm, interesting coincidence...
 
TN: I fantasized about making a film once.
 
BR: Yeah? Say more.
 
TN: It was going to be about the conquest of Mexico, with a twist of course. It would have been an epic --  the kind of production that costs hundreds of millions of dollars and you’d probably have to get the Weinsteins involved too.
 
BR: Uh-oh. Anything but that.
 
TN: Yeah, well it was completely out of reach. Just a fantasy. Especially considering I have no talent in that regard and no money.
 
BR: Well, fantasies are good. Nothing gets started without a dream.
 
TN: I could always write about it though -- make the production as lavish as I wanted. It wouldn’t cost a dime. I could take it anywhere. Haven’t yet.... but Barney’s film was much more doable. That’s what got me wondering. That and the initials you seem to share with him.
 
BR: Okay, okay, I confess. His initials are not a coincidence.
 
TN: What a surprise.
 
BR: Well, I’m very interested in identity… what it means, if anything. Particularly in a meta-fictional sort of way. I’ve built a small body of work now in which each protagonist shares my initials... which suggests they are alter-egos of mine.
 
TN: Which they are, since you invented them.
 
BR: Yes, but I’m also interested in breaking down the boundaries between fiction and so-called “real life”… to play a sort of Nabokovian game of letting the reader or listener imagine what is true or what isn’t. Or what is autobiographical and what isn’t. It adds another dimension of meaning, or anti-meaning, to the story.
 
TN: That reminds me of what Fernando Pessoa said about The Book of Disquiet. He called it his “factless autobiography.”
 
BR: Yes! Well, everything I write is factless autobiography, I would say. Thus the initials. Or the character names. I played with that a little in the novel I just finished, but I go way deeper in my other novel, which is still in progress. Characters with several layers of pseudonyms.
 
TN: Another reminder of Pessoa. He wrote under something like seventy-two different pseudonyms, but he called them heteronyms to emphasize that they were truly different beings, with different opinions and ways of writing.
 
BR: Almost like multiple personality disorder, but with self-awareness. Cool. And here’s another Pessoa tangent. I was reading some of his personal notes in which he says he no longer reads anything literary. Only technical books, for information. And then he says: “I have found out that reading is a slavish sort of dreaming. If I must dream, why not my own dreams?” I like that!
 
TN: I guess that could apply to listening to a literary podcast as well.
 
BR: Which is not to say, stop listening, or stop reading! No. But maybe our own dreams and ideas are the most important ones to pay attention to. Good reason to avoid Facebook.
 
TN: But wait a minute… we haven’t talked about your story.
 
BR: So ask me a question, Mr Interviewer.
 
TN: Is the story true?
 
BR: Haha, there you go, getting right into the unanswerable heart of it! Of course, the answer is yes and no. It’s true, but what the hell does that mean? By the way, you read it very convincingly, in such a way that it sounded very true… for you.
 
TN: Well thanks. So does performance equal reality?
 
BR: I think that sometimes it does. Maybe it’s masks all the way down.
 
TN: Hard to stay on topic today. We’ve talked about Fernando Pessoa instead of David Markson, who is a very interesting author and plays such an important role in your story.
 
BR: Yeah, Markson… there’s a guy who didn’t follow other people’s ideas of what fiction should be. During the last 20 years before he died, he wrote a series of ever more minimalist books that challenge the conventional ideas of what fiction is. His final book, from 2007, was called, fittingly…
 
TN: The Last Novel.
 
BR: Right.
 
TN: Maybe he knew he’d be dead soon.
 
BR: Maybe so. He’s been praised for creating his own personal genre in the realm of the avant garde… so perhaps not to everybody’s taste. I just became aware of him last fall when we were working on your story “Seven Cries of Delight,” which you said was an experiment in writing about nothing. So that was on my mind, and then I found Markson’s book This Is Not A Novel on a street vendor’s table, and there was the epigram by Swift on writing about nothing.
 
TN: Which you sent me a photo of.
 
BR: Yes.
 
TN: I like those kinds of synchronous moments. Enhanced by smartphone technology. I wonder how Carl Jung’s idea of synchronicity might have changed if he’d had the ability to instantly text about everything. Time seems warped somehow.
 
BR: Yeah, instantaneous feedback at every moment. But are we off on another tangent?
 
TN: Yeah. Why do you suppose we do that?
 
BR: I’d say we must be following the dreams of the author of this interview.
 
TN:  Is that you or me?
 
BR: I’m not sure. Is there a difference?
 
TN: Well, difference or not, after all this speculation on novels that aren’t novels and films that aren’t films, I think we should end by doing a performance of John Cage’s 4:26. First performed in Woodstock, I might add. Gives it a liitle more relevance. We could improvise an excerpt, we wouldn’t have to do the whole thing. That might be stretching it. What do you think?
 
BR: Sure. Let’s try it.
 
TN: All right. Why don’t you sit by the piano? And I’ll stand nearby like a lounge singer. We’ll record it in stereo. Ready?
 
BR: Yup.
 
TN: What time signature should we use?
 
BR: Does it matter?
 
TN: No I suppose not. Okay. One and two and three and four....
 
A few seconds of silence.
 
TN: Not bad. What do you think?
 
BR: It was going well but you just blew it by talking.
 
TN: We were finished. It was just an excerpt, remember?
 
BR: We never decided on a length. How am I supposed to know these things? Do you think I’m reading your mind, or we’re, like, the same person?
 
TN: Two different names doesn’t automatically mean two different identities, after all.
 
BR: Oh, right...

TN: The movie Barney is making at the end of the story -- was that a movie that you wanted to make? Or maybe even made?
 
BR: Well, I was a film major in college and worked many years on the periphery of the industry, so yeah, there have been a lot of films I’ve wanted to make, and a couple I’ve made. But Barney’s wasn’t one of them. That one was born in my writer’s mind, not my filmmaker’s mind. Why do you ask?
 
TN: Well you know.... Barney Rudolph... B.R.... it  makes you wonder.
 
BR: Oh, right. He shares my initials. Hmm, interesting coincidence...
 
TN: I fantasized about making a film once.
 
BR: Yeah? Say more.
 
TN: It was going to be about the conquest of Mexico, with a twist of course. It would have been an epic --  the kind of production that costs hundreds of millions of dollars and you’d probably have to get the Weinsteins involved too.
 
BR: Uh-oh. Anything but that.
 
TN: Yeah, well it was completely out of reach. Just a fantasy. Especially considering I have no talent in that regard and no money.
 
BR: Well, fantasies are good. Nothing gets started without a dream.
 
TN: I could always write about it though -- make the production as lavish as I wanted. It wouldn’t cost a dime. I could take it anywhere. Haven’t yet.... but Barney’s film was much more doable. That’s what got me wondering. That and the initials you seem to share with him.
 
BR: Okay, okay, I confess. His initials are not a coincidence.
 
TN: What a surprise.
 
BR: Well, I’m very interested in identity… what it means, if anything. Particularly in a meta-fictional sort of way. I’ve built a small body of work now in which each protagonist shares my initials... which suggests they are alter-egos of mine.
 
TN: Which they are, since you invented them.
 
BR: Yes, but I’m also interested in breaking down the boundaries between fiction and so-called “real life”… to play a sort of Nabokovian game of letting the reader or listener imagine what is true or what isn’t. Or what is autobiographical and what isn’t. It adds another dimension of meaning, or anti-meaning, to the story.
 
TN: That reminds me of what Fernando Pessoa said about The Book of Disquiet. He called it his “factless autobiography.”
 
BR: Yes! Well, everything I write is factless autobiography, I would say. Thus the initials. Or the character names. I played with that a little in the novel I just finished, but I go way deeper in my other novel, which is still in progress. Characters with several layers of pseudonyms.
 
TN: Another reminder of Pessoa. He wrote under something like seventy-two different pseudonyms, but he called them heteronyms to emphasize that they were truly different beings, with different opinions and ways of writing.
 
BR: Almost like multiple personality disorder, but with self-awareness. Cool. And here’s another Pessoa tangent. I was reading some of his personal notes in which he says he no longer reads anything literary. Only technical books, for information. And then he says: “I have found out that reading is a slavish sort of dreaming. If I must dream, why not my own dreams?” I like that!
 
TN: I guess that could apply to listening to a literary podcast as well.
 
BR: Which is not to say, stop listening, or stop reading! No. But maybe our own dreams and ideas are the most important ones to pay attention to. Good reason to avoid Facebook.
 
TN: But wait a minute… we haven’t talked about your story.
 
BR: So ask me a question, Mr Interviewer.
 
TN: Is the story true?
 
BR: Haha, there you go, getting right into the unanswerable heart of it! Of course, the answer is yes and no. It’s true, but what the hell does that mean? By the way, you read it very convincingly, in such a way that it sounded very true… for you.
 
TN: Well thanks. So does performance equal reality?
 
BR: I think that sometimes it does. Maybe it’s masks all the way down.
 
TN: Hard to stay on topic today. We’ve talked about Fernando Pessoa instead of David Markson, who is a very interesting author and plays such an important role in your story.
 
BR: Yeah, Markson… there’s a guy who didn’t follow other people’s ideas of what fiction should be. During the last 20 years before he died, he wrote a series of ever more minimalist books that challenge the conventional ideas of what fiction is. His final book, from 2007, was called, fittingly…
 
TN: The Last Novel.
 
BR: Right.
 
TN: Maybe he knew he’d be dead soon.
 
BR: Maybe so. He’s been praised for creating his own personal genre in the realm of the avant garde… so perhaps not to everybody’s taste. I just became aware of him last fall when we were working on your story “Seven Cries of Delight,” which you said was an experiment in writing about nothing. So that was on my mind, and then I found Markson’s book This Is Not A Novel on a street vendor’s table, and there was the epigram by Swift on writing about nothing.
 
TN: Which you sent me a photo of.
 
BR: Yes.
 
TN: I like those kinds of synchronous moments. Enhanced by smartphone technology. I wonder how Carl Jung’s idea of synchronicity might have changed if he’d had the ability to instantly text about everything. Time seems warped somehow.
 
BR: Yeah, instantaneous feedback at every moment. But are we off on another tangent?
 
TN: Yeah. Why do you suppose we do that?
 
BR: I’d say we must be following the dreams of the author of this interview.
 
TN:  Is that you or me?
 
BR: I’m not sure. Is there a difference?
 
TN: Well, difference or not, after all this speculation on novels that aren’t novels and films that aren’t films, I think we should end by doing a performance of John Cage’s 4:26. First performed in Woodstock, I might add. Gives it a liitle more relevance. We could improvise an excerpt, we wouldn’t have to do the whole thing. That might be stretching it. What do you think?
 
BR: Sure. Let’s try it.
 
TN: All right. Why don’t you sit by the piano? And I’ll stand nearby like a lounge singer. We’ll record it in stereo. Ready?
 
BR: Yup.
 
TN: What time signature should we use?
 
BR: Does it matter?
 
TN: No I suppose not. Okay. One and two and three and four....
 
A few seconds of silence.
 
TN: Not bad. What do you think?
 
BR: It was going well but you just blew it by talking.
 
TN: We were finished. It was just an excerpt, remember?
 
BR: We never decided on a length. How am I supposed to know these things? Do you think I’m reading your mind, or we’re, like, the same person?
 
TN: Two different names doesn’t automatically mean two different identities, after all.
 
BR: Oh, right...

Music on this episode:

Showers of Stones (excerpt) by xj5000.

Used by permission of the artist.

THE STRANGE RECITAL

Episode 18032

TSR_EGG_LOGO_W on B

This is not a podcast.